Chinese Government Card Swipe Crackdown Hits Macau

Gambling funds obtained through illicit card-swiping in Macau are estimated to 12 percent of mass market turnover. (Image: wikipedia.org/Brenden Brain)

The result of Asia’s imminent crackdown on the usage of hand-held card swipers is being felt in Macau, with the Wynn Macau witnessing its market decline that is biggest since October 2011.

Macau’s casino economy has soared throughout the last couple of years, so much so that it now eclipses Las vegas, nevada because the gambling money of the world, but the Chinese government’s sudden enforcement of a ban on illegal money transfers has investors worried; Wynn Resorts Ltd. fell recently to 8.5 percent at the close in Hong Kong trading, while MGM China Holdings Ltd. dropped 8.2 percent for the same duration. The Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd., meanwhile, fell 7.6 percent, while Sands Asia Ltd. dropped 4.6 per cent, and SJM Holdings Ltd., 6.6 percent.

Visitors to Macau from the mainland are permitted to bring no more than 20,000 yuan ($3,200) into the gambling hub and might just withdraw 10,000 yuan per time, per card, from money machines. To swerve the limitations, tourists have the ability to buy goods from local pawn shops using their debit cards then trade them for regional currency with the pawnbroker that is same.

Illegal Card-Swiping Amounts to $6 Billion

However, the use that is increasing of machines in gambling enterprises has not only caused a slump in Macau’s pawnbroking industry, but it’s also got the is royal vegas casino legit Chinese authorities jittery about tens of billions of yuan in illegal funds which are being taken out of the mainland and into Macau.

According to Karen Tang, an analyst at Deutsche Bank AG in Hong Kong, funds obtained through illicit card-swiping in Macau are estimated to amount to $6 billion per that’s about 12 percent of mass market turnover year.

Macau police made 12 arrests involving pay card fraudulence cases in February and March of this season. Six people were arrested on February eighteenth, with UnionPay card terminals, account publications and HK$700,000 of cash seized. Then, on March 6th, police said that they had arrested four more folks, with three China UnionPay card terminals, purchase receipts and HK$920,000 confiscated; two people had been arrested eight times later and police found four payment terminal devices, 304 bank cards, authentication machines, card usage receipts, Chinese travel permits and more than HK$3.4 million ($438,000) in money.

The company itself told press that it works closely with the authorities to combat all forms of illegal bank card use while China announced it would be imposing restrictions on the use of state-backed debit card company UnionPay.

Visa Restrictions

Meanwhile, the China that is state-owned Central station reported Macau could also face a tightening of control of its visa applications. Macau visitors whom don’t travel on up to a third-party country could get a stamp on their passport, which would jeopardize future visa applications.

The growth in Macau in the last few years has been in component because of the expansion of Chinese tourism, which has in turn been fueled by the emergence of a relaxation by the Chinese government on the restriction of movement for its residents. These restrictions that are new be another source of anxiety for Macau’s investors.

However, Union Gaming analyst Grant Govertsen urged investors not to panic, saying, ‘Judging from past experience, it’s often all bark and no bite. The shortening of a visitor’s stay or the stricter use of cash cards will not always curb the gamblers’ capacity to gamble.’

Illinois Lawmaker Makes Final Stand for Gambling Expansion

Democratic Illinois Representative Bob Rita is frustrated at absence of passion for their Illinois gambling bill, but still believes it can be passed. (Image: AP/Seth Perlman)

The clock may be ticking and the chances may be he believes will help plug a $1.8 billion hole in state coffers against him, but Democratic Representative Bob Rita, the main sponsor of a bill to expand gambling in the state of Illinois, is making a last-ditch attempt to gather support for the legislation.

This week while Illinois debates whether to extend the current temporary income tax in order to deal with the deficit, Rita expressed his frustration at a lack of urgency from the state’s politicians in a letter to House Speaker Michael Madigan and Republican leader Jim Durkin.

‘The reception to these amendments has been underwhelming,’ complained Rita, who added that he doesn’t realize why a bill that passed out from the chamber that is upper to be lacking any support.

Down towards the Wire

The legislation, scheduled to be heard in a residence committee Monday, wasn’t required a vote, but there’s still a chance that is slim the bill could possibly be changed or redrafted, and then passed by the Legislature before the May 31 deadline, and Rita is desperate to rally the troops.

Bill SB1849 proposes two options: a) the creation of five casinos that are new including one in Chicago, aswell as brand new slots and horseracing tracks; or b) the building of a Vegas-style ‘mega casino’ in Chicago.

$1 Billion a year for state and city

‘The Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce testified final month that a Chicago casino alone could generate almost $1 billion a year in revenue for the state and town, and that a 10,000-position casino as we allowed for in one amendment may possibly not be sufficient to generally meet the buyer need,’ said Rita.

The tax that is temporary runs away in January and it’s maybe not understood whether Democrats will garner enough votes to secure an extension. ‘Clearly, we’re likely to require revenue,’ reasoned Rita in his page.

It is clear that Bob Rita has his work cut out for him. Similar gambling plans happen passed by the legislature before, and then be vetoed at the final hurdle by Governor Pat Quinn. Quinn has yet to state whether he would approve the measure, but he obviously has hang-ups about Chicago’s checkered history of mobsters and corruption his two predecessors have been in prison for the latter as well as the concept of casino expansion makes him jittery. He vetoed an expansion bill in 2012 on the grounds it lacked ethical criteria and would attract ‘unsavory influences.’

No ‘Loopholes for Mobsters’

‘We’re not going to have loopholes for mobsters in Illinois,’ Quinn said at the time. ‘The bill which was on my desk was woefully deficient when it found protecting integrity and honesty and regulation of gambling in our state.’

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, meanwhile, has said he wants to resolve the $100 million pension crisis before considering gambling expansion.

Casino gaming found Illinois in 1990 aided by the passage through of the Riverboat Gambling Act, partly in reaction to Iowa’s decision to legalize riverboat gaming along the Mississippi River. At first the boats were required to cruise until law was passed in 1999 permitting them to moor permanently. Ten licenses were granted initially, with the proviso that no casino would be permitted within Cook County, to be able to preserve Chicago’s famous horseracing tracks, which are opposed to Rita’s efforts to expand casino gambling in their state.

New Lucky Streaks Study Actively Seeks Exactly What Makes Winners

Gamblers on winning streaks might appear to win more often, but study says that’s only since they’re making safer bets. (Image: ThinkStock.com)

Whoever has ever stepped base in a very casino or simply produced few friendly wagers with friends has probably run across a streak of amazing good or luck that is bad minimum as soon as. It’s that night where you can’t lose at roulette even at the poker table if you try, or the one where every coin flip goes against you.

For some gamblers, luck and superstition play major roles in their casino routines. Others point out that believing you can predict such good and bad streaks is just a kind of the gambling fallacy, and that there isn’t any solution to know whether random email address details are going to turn in your favor. However a study that is new this isn’t exactly real, thanks to the habits regarding the gamblers themselves.

Champions Keep Winning, Losers More Probably to Lose Once Again

According up to a new research by University College London psychology teacher Nigel Harvey and graduate pupil Juemin Xu, it turns out that winning players do have a tendency to keep winning, while losers are more inclined to continue their losing streaks. The research, posted in the might 2014 issue of Cognition, looked at online gamblers at an activities betting site to come to these conclusions.

Don’t worry: the study didn’t just rewrite the regulations of probability. Instead, it turns out that gamblers have a tendency to engage in behavior that improves the chances that they’ll carry on winning (or losing) more regularly than one might expect.

The study looked at over 565,000 wagers made by 776 bettors. Any customer made, their odds of winning was just 48 percent on the first bet. A follow-up to that winner would win at a 49 percent rate an extremely increase that is small barely seems significant. But from then on, chances went through the roof. A third bet would win 57 percent of the time after two wins. If the streak kept going, the following bets would win 67 percent of the time, then 72 percent, last but not least 75 % of the time for the sixth bet in a winning streak. Meanwhile, losing players saw their odds plunge as time continued. After a loss, gamblers would only come back to win 47 percent of the time. After two losses, that number dropped to 45 per cent, and kept heading down all the best way to a great 23 % after six losses.

Betting Behavior Makes Up Change

The numbers are hard to argue with. But if streaks aren’t predictable, just what could be causing this? The researchers first seemed to see in the event that players aided by the winning streaks were merely better at wagering than those that has runs that are bad. But in the end, both groups lost almost exactly the same amount of cash per pound they bet. Alternatively, it ends up that the response ended up being in the sorts of bets the gamblers were making. Players on winning streaks increasingly turned to safer bets to keep their streaks alive.

Meanwhile, losers had been trying riskier and riskier wagers either to chase their losses, or simply because they felt their fortune had to improve quickly. That behavior had been possibly inspired by the gambler’s fallacy: the idea that outcomes may have to ‘balance’ a person’s luck. However, it actually served to increase the likelihood that the streaks would continue.

Essentially, the ‘hot hand’ fallacy (the belief that hot streaks will continue, or the contrary regarding the gambler’s fallacy) ended up being found to be true, but just because players were actively helping their streaks to last longer than they might if they made similar bets regardless of their recent outcomes. It’s maybe not math that is new’s merely another method by which human behavior can cause some unanticipated results.

 

Share your thoughts Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment